Sam Levine - Free Initial Consultation  
  Personal Injury Attorney  
 
Practice Areas Home The Firm Practice Areas Questions Contact
 
 


Accutane
Actos
AMO Complete
Antidepressants
Auto Accidents
Avandia
Baby Car Seats
Benzene
Bextra
Castleberry Canned Food
Celebrex
Civil Litigation
Diptheria
Digitek
Drug-Coated Stents
Duragestic Patch
Fosamax
Haemophilis Influenza Type B
Heparin
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis B
Hormone Therapy
Ketek
Kugel Hernia Patch
Measles
Medical Malpractice
Medtronic Lead Wires
Meningoccal
MRI Contrast
Neurontin
Nuva Ring
Ortho Evra Patch
Pacemakers/Defibrillators
Papillomavirus
Paxil
Permax
Pertussis
Pneumococal Conjugate
Plane Crashes
Polio
Premises Liability
Remicade
Renal Failure
Renu with MoistureLoc
Risperdal
Rotovirus
Seatbelt Failure
Seroquel
SUV Rollover Accidents
Tequin
Tetanus
Trivalent Influenza
Trucking Accidents
Vaccine Injuries
Varicella
Viagra
Vioxx
Wrongful Death
Zelnorm
Zyprexa

Neurotin

Marketing of Neurontin

NeurontinNeurontin is one of Pfizer’s best-selling drugs and has been among the 50 most-prescribed drugs in the U.S. since 2003. More than 12 million people in 60 countries have used Neurontin, and its sales are nearing the $3 billion mark annually. In recent years, however, Pfizer has come under criticism for its marketing of Neurontin, including allegations that it quietly marketed the drug for at least a dozen off-label uses.

Lawsuit filed against world’s biggest drug company
In April 2004, a Neurontin lawsuit against Pfizer, the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, alleged that it illegally and fraudulently reaped millions of dollars in profits by marketing Neurontin for unapproved, or “off-label” uses. Neurontin was approved by the FDA in 1993 as an adjunct (add-on) therapy for controlling partial epileptic seizures.

Pfizer has been criticized for quietly marketing Neurontin for at least a dozen unapproved, “off-label” uses.

Warner-Lambert’s Parke-Davis division, which was acquired by Pfizer in 2000, used aggressive and illegal strategies to market and promote Neurontin for untested uses. It is illegal for a drug company to market a medication for unapproved uses.

Fraudulent marketing scheme pays off
In order to increase the sales of Neurontin, Pfizer embarked on a fraudulent marketing scheme, deliberately misrepresenting the scientific, medical and clinical data about how safe, effective and useful Neurontin was for conditions other than epilepsy.

As a result, health insurers paid claims for Neurontin to treat a variety of off-label conditions for which the drug was not proven to be helpful.  Needless to say, Pfizer’s marketing practices made no mention of Neurontin’s various side effects, the most serious being the increased tendency to commit suicide.

Pfizer’s scheme reaped huge financial returns, as revenue for Neurontin jumped from $97.5 million in 1995 to nearly $2.7 billion in 2003. By then, some 90% of all Neurontin prescriptions were for off-label uses. In 2004, Pfizer pled guilty and agreed to pay $430 million to resolve all criminal charges and civil liabilities related to its illegal and fraudulent marketing of Neurontin.


 
 

Home | The Firm | Practice Areas | Questions | Contact | Privacy Statement | Site Map

5180 | Roswell Rd. | South Bldg, Suite 201 | Atlanta | GA 30342 | Phone: (404) 303-8875 | Fax: (404) 303-8709
Toll Free: 888-404-LAWYER | Email: sam@samlevine.com
© 2008 - Atlanta Injury Lawyer - All Rights Reserved

Website Designed by Elegant Image Studios, Inc.